Home > Issues > Human Rights for Men > Making New Zealand Democratic by Removing a Bill of Rights Loophole |
|||||||||||||||||
Empowering Men:fighting feminist lies |
|||||||||||||||||
Making New Zealand Democratic by Removing a Bill of Rights Loophole(twice updated and slightly edited)Peter Zohrab 2024 |
|||||||||||||||||
Letter to MinisterReply from MinisterReply to Minister(Open Letter to the Minister of Justice)Dear Mr. Goldsmith,IntroductionThe Novel, "Animal Farm", which is a satire on Communism, contains the famous sentence:
Countries such as New Zealand formally adhere to Human Rights laws, but get around them by creating Communist-style loopholes and making lists of favourites, in order to make sure that some (human) animals are more equal than others.What I am talking about here is exemplified by section 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.Section 19 of NZBORA reads:
(Although I am not up to date on this matter, I assume that this section is still in force.)I propose that the phrase "in good faith" be deleted and replaced with the phrase "on the basis of objective evidence", because it is a very low bar to require only that someone have an ideological or religious faith or belief that something is true, in what purports to be Human Rights legislation.The reason for this proposal is that New Zealand lacks both a democratic media sector and a democratic education sector. Instead of these sectors examining both sides of every issue, they are full of activists who concentrate on furthering particular political agendas (especially Feminism) and blocking the expression of views or publication of evidence that contradict these agendas. This totalitarian approach has the effect of brainwashing both decision-makers and the public about exactly who fits the description "persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination." This instills in the minds of decision-makers and the public a quasi-religious faith about such matters. This is what makes Feminism the State Ideology of countries such as New Zealand.This presumed "good faith" then leads to so-called "positive" discrimination (affirmative action), which discriminates negatively against other groups of people (especially men), making women more equal than men.Some ExamplesHere is a particularly glaring example of the Feminist bias of the media. In my article, "TV3's Primitive Religion", I wrote:
The media also disseminate blatant Feminist lies, which is why it has become famously acceptable for certain US politicians to retaliate by telling their own lies. For example, TV One's "Breakfast" programme recently mentioned the fact that a woman had started a petition against the wearing of g-string bikinis at her local swimming-pool. According to Radio New Zealand, "Her campaign started after her eight-year-old son was exposed to some g-string wearers while he was at a swimming lesson.". However, TV One explained the issue as being about the sexualisation of women's bodies -- as if women were (as always) the victims of men in this case. In fact, the issue was that some women gave themselves the right to be exhibitionist, and subjected young males to non-consensual titillation, for the benefit of the women's own feelings of sexual power and domination.The media also train men to think and behave in a Feminist manner. On 15 July 2024, at 8:15 AM1, TV One's "Breakfast" programme took it upon themselves to interview a self-styled "expert" on what they called "Healthy Masculinity." That is extremely sexist, arrogant and discriminatory. They should interview me about "healthy Femininity", so that I can tell the media how they (since they all are -- or think like -- women) should think and behave!And here is a particularly glaring example of the Feminist bias of the education system. In my article, "New Zealand, the Nazi Germany of the South Pacific" I wrote:
It is a factual matter, dependent on evidence, whether women are oppressed more than men are, or men are oppressed more than women are, or both are oppressed equally, or neither are oppressed. But these factual matters are never debated transparently in the media or education system. Instead, the Feminist doctrine that women are oppressed (and men are not) is taken for granted. There is a mass of evidence that men are discriminated against more than women are. See, for example, this Manifesto.Official Information Act RequestsI refer to section 5 of NZBORA, which uses the phrase "a free and democratic society".
Yours sincerely,Peter ZohrabNOTE: I could have been watching on Channel 11, which shows programmes with one hour's delay.
|
|||||||||||||||||
In due course, I received the following reply:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
I replied as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
See also: |
|||||||||||||||||
Someone has let women out of the kitchen -- and they have been telling lies ever since!
|
|||||||||||||||||
|