Maori Men are the Main Victims
of the Feminist Divide-and-Rule Strategy
Peter Zohrab 2020
(Open Letter to the Minister for Regional Economic
Development)
Dear Mr. Jones,
I am writing to you in your capacity as the unofficial Minister for Maori
Men.
As a generalisation, I would say that Maori men are less Feminist than Christian
or Agnostic White men (apart from Catholics) and less Feminist than Jews (apart
from Ultra-Orthodox Jews). When I was Secretary of the New Zealand Men for
Equal Rights Association, our President, Mike Baird, was a Maori and I also
had constructive correspondence with the former Speaker of Parliament (a Maori
), the late Sir
Peter Tapsell.
In saying that Maori Men are the main victims of the Feminist Divide-and-Rule
strategy, I mean that (in New Zealand) the Feminists have been trying to isolate
Maori men from their Bros of other ethnic groups, so that they can selectively
demonise Maori men and totally disempower them, mainly using the Domestic
Violence Act (1995). I refer, for example, to a recent court case where a
Maori woman got a mere slap on the wrist with a wet bus ticket as punishment
for killing her male partner (Domestic
violence trial: Abused woman Karen Anne Ruddelle not guilty of murder, but
guilty of manslaughter (Domestic violence trial: Abused woman Karen Anne Ruddelle
not guilty of murder, but guilty of manslaughter). I have had several
personal experiences of the Police refusing to believe that females had assaulted
me physically, and I have experienced unprovoked aggressive behaviour by Maori
(as well as White) women -- some of which has been witnessed by other people
or recorded by closed-circuit television cameras (see below).
Therefore I suspect that the Maori man who was killed had either reported
his partner's violence to the Police and had not been believed, or did not
report her violence because he was sure he would not be believed. I have also
written about Police and Judicial anti-male double standards in my article
about a Maori couple: Bias in the case: R v Danny
Brian Mayes. Because the State does not generally support men against
violent women, men are thrown back onto their own resources, which makes it
easy for women to provoke and assault them -- and ultimately to kill them,
without serious penalty. The Police can easily be manipulated into creating
a record of Domestic Violence for a particular man, while ignoring the woman's
violence. That then puts the woman in a position to kill the man, if she wants
to, and she will then be treated by the courts as Karen Anne Ruddelle was.
See also my article on a similar case: Court Falls
for Old Philosophical Trick , where the same "psychologist",
Dr Alison Towns, was the prime defence witness.
When I went to The Warehouse, in Lyall Bay, Wellington, a few years
ago, I bought a very long, "Mako" brand metal trunk and (since
I like having exercise) I carried it, with difficulty, all the way to
the checkout. Someone stood behind me and impeded me as I tried to maneuvre
between the tills and I saw that it was a Maori female employee of The
Warehouse. I complained to management, saying that they would be able
to see the incident on closed-circuit television.
When I had just enrolled as a patient at the North Avon Medical Centre,
Christchurch, a few months ago, I was sitting in the waiting-room when a
Maori woman and a Lesbian-looking White woman came up to me and poked their
tongues out at me in a hostile manner.
Following some similar behaviour by a couple of White women, a Maori woman
on the footpath pulled her dog back so that I could walk past and then let
her dog move forward towards my legs as soon as I drew level.
As I report in the page, Scum-Police Deliberately
Prosecute Innocent Man, I was assaulted by a Maori woman on a train,
I called the Police, but the Police arrested and charged ME! All the objective
evidence favoured what I said, but a lot of White people (mainly women)
were prepared tell huge lies and get me convicted.
Domestic Violence
As you know, the media are political organisations dedicated to furthering
the domination of women over men by selective reporting, selective censorship,
propaganda-mongering and outright lies. Therefore they have long been pushing
the Feminist "Power and Control" (aka Duluth) model of Domestic
Violence, which prejudges, predetermines and presumes that Domestic Violence
is basically something that men do to women (i.e. it has no relation to any
credible evidence whatsoever). Since people like me have determinedly and
repeatedly been pointing out that there is heaps of evidence to the contrary
(See the annotated bibliography at https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm),
the Feminists have resorted to claiming that there are really two types of
Domestic Violence -- one type which conforms to the evidence that women do
it just as much to men as vice-versa -- and the other type, for which there
is no evidence, but which conforms to their man-hating Duluth ("Power
and Control) fantasy.
Kiwi women already kill Kiwi men by conscripting them
against their will into war, Kiwi women are about to gain the unfettered power
to kill their partners' unborn children and now they have got all the legal
system ducks lined up to be able to kill their partners and get away with
a slap on the wrist with a wet bus-ticket. This is starting with Maori men
and is bound to spread throughout the population.