It has been widely
reported that a recent study on marriage and wealth has found that marriage
increases your wealth. This study, "Marriage
and Divorce’s Impact on Wealth", by Jay L. Zagorsky, was published
in the Journal of Sociology Vol. 41, No. 4, 406-424 (2005)*.
In fact, however, the study arguably proves something completely different
from what it claims to prove, and it is a sad commentary on Western universities
and media, now that the Feminists and other politically correct people are
in control.
"A Feminist uses statistics like a fish uses a bicycle" (as Christina
Hoff Sommers wrote in Figuring Out Feminism. in National Review
magazine, June 27, 1994), and there is a widespread belief that Sociology
is Feminism in sheep's clothing. So it is not surprising that this study misuses
statistics.
The study states that "Divorced respondents’ wealth starts falling
four years before divorce...." That is odd, for a start -- only in the
field of nuclear physics has anyone ever tried to claim that a cause came
after an effect ! If their wealth started falling before
the divorce happened, then it would be natural to assume that the drop in
wealth (or something else) caused the divorce -- not that the divorce retroactively
caused the drop in wealth ! The author tries to explain this by assuming that
the drop in wealth is caused by separation, which occurs before the actual
divorce, but he does not produce statistics to prove this. In fact, of course,
the average period of separation prior to divorce is unlikely to be anything
close to four years.
Masculist Reality
It is well-known that women are attracted to wealthy men. Women talk without
apparent embarrassment about wanting to marry a millionnaire. It is rare for
men to talk about marrying a rich woman. Even amongst non-human animals, females
often value males in proportion to their territorial or other property assets
-- See, for example, http://entomology.unl.edu/lgh/ent806/Lecture17_mating.htm
. The converse of that is, presumably, that women may fall out of love with
a man whose wealth decreases. In fact, it is widely believed in the Men's/Fathers'
Movement that social welfare payments for single mothers are an incentive
to separation and divorce, so that the State, in effect, replaces the father
as provider.
Exploitation
Feminists have an entire research industry devoted
to classifying as exploitation (by men of women) every imaginable aspect of
male-female relationships. Naturally, therefore, prostitution is sometimes
described as exploitation of women by men. In fact, however, it involves the
financial exploitation (mainly by women) of the sex-drives of (mainly) men.
It has often been pointed out that marriage can also
be described as prostitution, whereby the female provides sex in return for
financial support. That model does not fit all marriages totally, of course,
but it certainly fits many marriages to a large extent.
Pay Equity
It follows from the above that there may be an argument for ensuring that
men have higher salaries than women -- otherwise Society ends up with a lot
of fatherless children, because their mothers are unable to find men richer
than themelves to whom they can feel attracted on a long-term basis.... Hello
! That is exactly what we have in Western societies today!
(* The author states, in an email to me, that "The
goal of the paper was to track changes over time. The primary goal was not
to investigate cause and effect." Jeff Grabmeier (Assistant Director,
Research Communications Ohio State University), in an email to me, states:
"You are right that the data collected in this study cannot prove one
way or the other the direction of causality.")