(Open Letter to World Leaders)
Dear Jacinda Ardern, Donald Trump and all other Heads of States and
Governments,
The Crisis
I mention this, because the American media is possibly on the verge
of destroying the United States, by determinedly lying about the riots
in Portland, Oregon and elsewhere and bringing about a second civil
war. As I have pointed out elsewhere, the Washington Post is among the
media which have told lies, resulting in the
sexist and racist Black Lives Matter movement. According to Wikipedia,
"On 17 February 2017, President of the United States Donald Trump
declared on Twitter that The New York Times, NBC News, ABC, CBS, and
CNN were "fake news" and the
"enemy of the people"." I couldn't
have said it better myself!
According to the
Washington Post's database, thirty-one
Black people per million have been killed by US police, which is somewhat
more than the rate for Hispanics (twenty-three per million), Whites
(thirteen per million) and "Others" (4 per million). However,
thirty-four males per million have been killed
by US police, which is vastly more than the rate for females, which
is only 1.5 per million. The discrepancy between the police
shooting rate for males and females is VASTLY greater than the discrepancy
between the rates for Blacks and Whites.
Moreover, the Washington Post is sexist
and racist. I had to calculate
the male-female discrepancy for myself, whereas the Washington
Post' page presents a bar-graph with the racial rates -- as if that
was the most important discrepancy -- under the heading: "Black
Americans are killed at a much higher rate than white Americans".
However, they are only killed at TWICE the rate for Whites, whereas
males are killed at TWENTY-TWO TIMES the rate for females! And the
Washington Post spells "Black" with a capital letter and
only allows "Whites" to have a lower-case "w",
which is also racist.
This is a symptom of the entrenched secular cultural misandry (man-hatred)
and anti-white racism of the self-styled "elites" of Western
countries -- i.e. of these countries' MUC (Media-University Complex).
This is not to deny the existence of misogyny and anti-Black racism
in other parts of society.
The basic phenomenon we are dealing with here is a Leftist alliance
which dominates the media. This alliance is composed of Feminists, racial
minorities, gender minorities and other Leftists. This alliance believes
in a predetermined ideology and only tells the public those versions
of reality which fit this ideology. For example, if the media show an
image of police officers mistreating a Black man, the Feminists in the
media will make sure that this is portrayed as
being about someone being Black, rather than about his being a male.
The Feminists constitute a media roadblock which prevents men being
portrayed as victims, as far as possible. When do our TV companies show
us images of police officers mistreating a White man, as related in
the webpage: "'You're
gonna kill me!': Dallas police body cam footage reveals the final minutes
of Tony Timpa's life"?
On Television New Zealand's "Breakfast" programme on 12th
June 2020, I saw Hayley Holt interview Jacqui McGuire (a psychologist)
about unconscious bias. Once McGuire had explained that all of us had
biases that we were unconscious of, Holt immediately launched into an
attack on White people for having biases against Black people. In other
words, Hayley Holt was claiming not to have any biases herself, and
that she knew that White people had biases against Black people (and
not vice-versa, by implication). Holt obviously had only invited McGuire
onto the show in order to give her a chance to attack White biases against
Blacks! Holt subsequently disappeared from the "Breakfast"
programme and turned up as a sports reporter on the evening news. I
assume that McGuire had complained about the distortion of her views
which had taken place. Holt was a former snowboarder. TVNZ and TV3 have
an unfortunate tendency to turn retired snowboarders, netballers and
cricketers into morning television hosts -- probably because of their
stardom. This is unfortunate, because it would be preferable to have
competent people in these roles. In addition, they are addicted to "Diversity",
so these stations dish up to us a mixture of males, females, Homosexuals,
Maoris, Whites and Asians, etc., instead of people chosen for their
competence. Diversity is inherently discriminatory, since it involves
discriminating against competent people on the basis of their gender,
race or sexual orientation, etc..
Of course, anti-Black racism has existed, exists
and will continue to exist. However, the point is the totalitarian
media should not be allowed to interpret every possible event as a case
of anti-Black racism, just because it suits the
Feminists for that to happen. I refer now to a New Zealand television
interview with the co-leader of the Maori Party, John Tamihere.
John Tamihere and the child protection agency,
Oranga Tamariki
One day, when I was a teacher at Tararua College, in Pahiatua, I was
teaching Social Studies in a ground-floor classroom (the building may
actually have only had one floor). Suddenly, loud music started blasting
out from a large radio which someone had placed on a grassy area outside
the block of classrooms. I went to it, turned it off and started to
carry it into my classroom. A Maori youth appeared and demanded that
I give him the radio, meaning that he had been the person responsible
for the radio being there. You have to ask yourself why he had done
that, and I would speculate that it was possibly motivated by racist
hatred of that "Honky" school. I found out later that he was
a gang prospect. I ignored him and kept on walking towards my classroom.
He put his fist in my side, but he removed it when I told him to, as
I was much bigger than he was. By this time we were just outside my
classroom. I went inside, with him following me, complaining that it
was not his radio. I said "Tough!" and told him to get out.
At that moment, a Maori teacher, John Ngarimu, appeared and called to
him by name. The youth immediately went to Mr. Ngarimu. Again, you have
to ask yourself why he put his fist into the side of a White teacher
(myself), but was immediately compliant when spoken to by another Maori.
It seems fair to assume that he was racist and therefore more likely
to accept instructions from another Maori than from a White.
In the television interview with Maori Party Co-Leader, John Tamihere,
on the page "Maori
Party proposes new independent child agency," Mr. Tamihere
(who I have met) said that there should
be a purely Maori agency (funded mainly by Non-Maoris, of course) to
undertake the care and protection of Maori children. He said that uplifts
of children should take place, when necessary, but not with the involvement
of the Police. The interviewer pointed out to him that sometimes the
parents did not want to give up the children, but Mr. Tamihere implied
that the new Maori agency would be able to uplift children without the
help of the Police. He did not explain why this was. In the context
of the incident at Tararua College, we can see that the reason (if Mr.
Tamihere is correct) would be Maori racism towards the state child-welfare
agency, which is the agent of the mainly Non-Maori government of New
Zealand. The scenario would be that Maori parents would be more likely
to accept uplifts which were carried out by a Maori agency.
I am of mixed ancestry (as we all are, really!). Both as a child and
as an adult, I have lived in many countries and learned several languages
(to various extents) and both my wives have been from a country that
is very different from New Zealand. Many White people who do not have
this sort of background often have absolutely no idea that Non-Whites
can be racist too. Most White people either are or are not racist towards
particular racial groups, but no one has told them that these other
people either are or are not racist towards particular racial groups,
too.
Once, when I was living in London, I noticed a lot of publicity about
the supposed mistreatment of Blacks by the Police in the suburb of Brixton.
I went there once during this period and made a phone call from a public
phone from Brixton underground train ("Tube") station. This
was not late at night. The phone was not enclosed in any box, but was
in the open, on a wall. While I was making the phone call, I felt a
tugging at my upper thigh and noticed a Black teenager trying to pick
my pocket. That was stupid thing to do, because I had taken to putting
my wallet in my side pocket, from where no one could extract it without
my noticing it. He and his friend ran away down the stairs, stopped,
turned around and laughed at me. They thought it was great fun! No one
else has ever tried to pick my pocket -- even in Third World countries.
So, although it is perfectly possible that there was some mistreatment
of Blacks by the Police, the basic problem was crime committed by Blacks
in that suburb. All the criminals were presumably someone's son/daughter,
brother/sister, etc. and the probability is that the Black community
were more interested in helping their Black kith and kin that in helping
the White Police. How did the Blacks treat the Police?
The Crime and Arrest Statistics
According to the Wikipedia article, "Race
and crime in the United States", the homicide offending rate
for African Americans was almost eight times higher than for Whites
and robberies with White victims and Black offenders were more than
12 times more common than vice versa. Thus Blacks
may be under-represented in the police killing statistics, rather
than over-represented, as the media are pretending. After all, Blacks
are only killed at twice the rate for Whites.
According to the Wikipedia article, "Sex
differences in crime", in 2014, more than 73% of those arrested
in the US were males, i.e. almost three times as many men as women were
arrested by the police. Therefore, since males are killed by the police
at twenty-two times the rate for females, males
are massively over-represented in police killing statistics.
Entrenched Secular Cultural Misandry (Man-Hatred)
by the Media
New Zealand television has given massive coverage to the protests
and riots in the USA which resulted from the filming of a few recent
police killings. The images of the people being killed, of people marching
in the streets and of vandals and looters perpetrating criminal acts
have made for compelling television. We had a right to expect some analysis,
but I have not seen any -- no mention of the statistics listed above.
Instead of analysis, the media have presented us with the emotive images
which sparked all the above-mentioned lunatic behaviour by people in
Portland, etc.! Why is this? This is because the media is full of women
and other Feminists and they are simply not interested in men, except
as sex-objects. They wanted us to think like the lunatic people of Portland,
etc.. As far as the media are concerned, if they
can get us to hate men and Whites, that is just a case of MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!
See also:
|
