Home > Issues > Humanities & the Natural & Social Sciences > More Lies and Scams From University Lie-Factories

The Black Ribbon Campaign

Empowering Men:

fighting feminist lies

More Lies and Scams From University Lie-Factories

Peter Zohrab 2021

Home Page Articles about Issues 1000 links
alt.mens-rights FAQ Sex, Lies & Feminism Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals Email us ! Site-map

 

This is a partial book review of: Bribiescas, Richard G. (2006): Men: Evolutionary and Life History, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

 

The Big Lie

As I said in my article, "Two Power-Shifting Left-Wing Lies", the Feminists and other Leftists have conquered and colonised all the professions, including the professions that are involved in the education sector, the media and the Law. I have already written quite a bit about various universities, but the following example of a university lie (from the Conclusion of the above book, on page 219) is quite spectacular:

"The topic of human male evolutionary biology involves and is interrelated with many issues that are at the core of science: women's rights, psychology, violence, warfare, socioeconomic conditions, and so on."

I have studied Political Science, the Philosophy of Science and various scientific subjects and it is blatantly obvious that "women's rights" is a political term and intrinsically has nothing at all to do with science. You might expect that Bribiescas would at least explain his apparently ludicrous statement, but he does not. The closest he comes to explaining it is to ask:

"Can Biology predict which specific individual is destined to be the next Hitler or the next abusive spouse?"

From that question, we can deduce that Bribiescas is blaming men for warfare and for Domestic Violence. However, he provides no evidence to back up these misandristic (man-hating) slurs. In fact, his Conclusion (the final chapter) is seven pages long, but contains only seven references to research articles or books. By contrast, the previous seven pages contain 13 references to research articles or books and most of the book contains several references per page. In the university context, the supposedly evil nature of men is a fundamental ideological belief, and requires no evidence. Nevertheless, as I pointed out in my article, Women and War, almost all of the prominent female leaders from recent decades were involved in warlike activities and that is conclusive disproof of the claim that female leaders are inherently more peaceful than male leaders. And Professor Martin Fiebert's annotated bibliography "examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners."

 

Glaring Omissions

  1. On page 84, the author mentions that "The left hemisphere of the brain is often smaller than the right in male fetuses, while in female fetuses the brain tends to be more symmetrical."

  2. He also mentions on page 86 that female fetuses had a larger corpus callosum (the link between the two brain hemispheres) than male fetuses.

  3. However, he did not mention the well-known fact that "mean brain size (weight or volume) is 9-12% larger in men than in women" (S.F. Witelson, H. Beresh and D.L. Kigar "Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors," Brain 2006, 129, 386-398).

  4. He also did not mention the fact that "men tend to modulate their reaction to stimuli and engage in analysis and association, whereas women tend to draw more on primary emotional reference" (Hall et al. 2003, "Sex differences in functional activation patterns revealed by increased emotion processing demands," Neuroreport Vol. 15 No. 2, 9 February 2004) -- i.e. that women are less rational than men.

  5. It is not surprising that he did not mention that testosterone seems to reduce lying in men (implying that women possibly lie more than men do, since they have less testosterone), because Bribiescas' book was published in 2006, before this finding about testosterone was published.

The clear pattern is that Bribiescas only mentions negative facts about men and positive facts about women.

 

Why Lie?

The Acknowledgements of this book mention the author's wife. Ideally, men should be able to write books about men without some woman looking over their shoulder. We can only speculate as to whether she censored or otherwise influenced the contents of this book. In addition, we have to bear in mind that he was researching the topic of men, which is not something that the Feminists are likely to have been very happy about. In order to be allowed to do this, he would have had to make sure he did not contradict any Feminist doctrines.

As I said in another book review, whether involuntarily (because they have been brainwashed by their Feminist environment) or deliberately (because they are Feminist activists, or merely afraid for their careers), academics churn out slipshod and even self-contradictory drivel which pleases their Feminist mistresses.  This has severe implications for the ability of non-Feminist men to succeed in higher education.   

 

See also:

Someone has let women out of the kitchen -- and they have been telling lies ever since!

 

FAQ

Webmaster

Peter Douglas Zohrab

Latest Update

30 January 2021

Top