|
|
Empowering Men:
|
Letter From Ireland
(Anonymous) |
|
|
Greetings from Ireland. I just thought that
you might have some interest in how "Family Law" in a DE FACTO way
unfolds in Ireland.
1.01: If Tom wants out of his Marriage, Tom packs Tom's bags & leaves,
no money no children, no house, rendering Mary almost a widow and proper order
which is fine by me and you I would imagine. Similarly, if Mary wants out
of her Marriage, Tom packs Tom's bags & leaves, no money no children,
no house, rendering Mary almost a widow which is grossly unfair. In Ireland
the headline that appeared in for a newspaper article ‘A married man
remains part of the marriage family as his wife's guest' is, in light the
realities a vast understatement. Some time ago a retiring Moderator of the
Presbyterian Church of Ireland said 'Fathers in families these days are a
bit like a sunroof in a car; nice things to have but you do not really need
them' at the Presbyterian Church General Assembly.
2.01: In my view EQUALITY in "Family Court" is the best way to
defend Marriage & children. This "Family" Court Equality, all
things being equal, (no abuse or violence or bits on the side etc.) will mean
that the spouse who wants out, leaves NO children, NO money & NO house
rendering the innocent spouse a widow or a widower almost as the case may
be. This Equality will also IMMEDIATELY end the Nasty Divorces, the Gold Digging,
the FALSE Allegations and the Bitter Custody Battles that feature so prominantly
in the media today. But the deserting spouse will be required to tell the
children, in COURT with a Judge listening when the youngest child is 25, why
the children had NO mother or NO father as the case may be. Since walking
out, the destering spouse would have been FORBIDDEN to contact the children
directly or indirectly except through the INNOCENT spouse's lawyer. If the
divorce is mutual BOTH parents must be required to tell the children, in COURT
with a Judge listening, (Ladies First) when the youngest child is 25, why
the children had NO mother or NO father as the case may be. In an IDEAL world,
Divorce would be scrapped, or modified so that ONLY the INNOCENT spouse can
re-marry.
2.02: According to Court records, 70% (YES SEVENTY PERCENT) of Divorces in
Ireland, that do NOT involve Abuse & DO involve children are filed by
the wife.
2.03: Following the joint custody model MERELY keeps the TOXIC PARASITES the
'Family Court judges, Social Services lawyers, psychotherapists, mediators,
counsellors, social workers, etc collecting salaries from child abuse.
2.04: I have little or no doubt that within twenty years, the phrases 'walking
out on your INNOCENT spouse' and 'child abuse' will be interchangeable.
2.05: In my view the PARENT who walks out (unless there is Abuse or Cheating
involved) is an UNFIT parent who could NOT give a damm about the children.
3.01: Until EQUALITY reigns men must under NO circumstances marry. Even
though the statement "But Not All Women Are Like That" is valid
& true, the statement "But ALL 'Family' Courts Are Like That"
is even more true. Marriage THESE days is so emotionally, financially &
legally dangerous for a man that not even a brain-dead gambling addict, having
spent a week boozing would urge a man to take the chance.
3.02: It takes TWO people to marry but ONE to get a divorce.
3.03: So WHEN Equality reigns men will AGAIN marry. After the US Civil War
black men could not marry their ladies fast enough. In some places in the
former Confederacy, the Courthouses had to be kept open late, to cope with
the demand.
4.01: States turned against smoking when the cost of treating sick smokers
exceeded the revenue from tobacco. The same will happen regarding the Liberal
Agenda. Possibly the $1.5 BILLION that George W. Bush spent to promote the
marriage family might be seen in 30 years time as the turning of the wheel.
5.01: On a far far more SINISTER note, you may like to know that there is
a political party in the Netherlands that wants Pedophilia legalized and 12
years of age to become the Age of Sexual Consent.
6.01: I listened to The Communist Manifesto on Youtube in which we hear:
6.02: The "Children's Rights" and the "Bad Parents" speeches,
6.03: The "State Education" speeches,
6.04: The "End of the Family" especially the Marriage Family speeches,
6.05: The "Abolish Countries and Nations" speeches.
How little things change!!!!
7.01: On a general note, if social workers gave an X, Y, or Z about children,
we would listen to social workers ring the alarm bells on the Liberal Agenda.
But not only do we NOT hear social workers ring those particular alarm bells,
we in actual fact hear social workers (at least here in Ireland) act as the
cheerleaders for the Liberal/Child Abuse/Fatherless agenda. As we speak "Same-Sex
Marriage" is the new Liberal Agenda demand, being compared to Martin
Luther King & Civil Rights, according to our Deputy Prime Minister recently.
8.01: I know of an American Men's Rights Activist who says 'You want Equality
girls? No problem. Well chaps let us give the girls Equality as requested.
OK, chaps do NOT hold the door for her, do NOT give up your seat to her, do
NOT get her a chair, do NOT carry her bag, do NOT hold her coat for her, do
NOT let her before you in the queue, do NOT step aside in a corridor or in
the street for her' and even though I strongly disagree, I can understand
his reasoning. Meanwhile I insist that my son CARRIES his sister's bag to
the schoolbus in the morning. (Some time ago my son told me how he had hopped
off the bus to see an old lady struggling with shopping bags. He then carried
the old lady's shopping bags to her door.)
9.01: I think that the 'marriage strike' by men in the USA and increasingly
throughout Western countries MIGHT just be the beginning of the end for this
toxic tsumanai known as 'Family Law' in the West.
9.02: Men must remain Chivalrous to tell those women who value marriage &
men that it is now up to WOMEN to get the Gender Bias laws changed to achieve
Equality. So a girl who experiences Decent, Dependable Dave who holds the
door for her, gives up his seat to her, gets her a chair, carries her bag,
holds her coat for her, lets her before him in the queue, stands aside for
her in the corridor or the street, is getting a POWERFUL message. Decent,
Dependable Dave is showing the girls what THEY are missing and demonstarting
to the girls that Chivalry is a TWO-WAY street. This message becomes even
MORE powerful when Decent, Dependable Dave REFUSES to alllow ANY female interaction
go beyond casual social pleasantries. So if the girls want Layabout Larry/Scumbag
Steve who treats girls like dirt, they are MOST welcome to him.
9.03: Let us say here that Decent, Dependable Dave marries Maria from Manila
as Dave has seen his buddies, neighbours & relations discarded like old
shoes in "Family" Court when the Western wife walked out on an INNOCENT
spouse. Let us make Dave a truck driver who works day and night to provide
for his wife & children. Let us say that after 9 years Maria is a stay-at-home
Mom with 5 children. In short Dave was a PERFECT husband. Maria has spent
all her days at home watching TV and listening to the Daytime TV Man/Husband-Hating
message. Maria walks out. She gets ABSOLUTELY everything. Suddenly, Dave discovers
the HARD, BRUTAL, BITTER way that it is "HER" children, "HER"
house, "HER" income, "HER" Tax Rebate, "HER"
pension scheme but HIS bills. Conclusion: It makes ABSOLUTELY NO difference
for Decent, Dependable Dave to marry Arlene from Alabama or Maria from Manila.
10.01: I have NO DOUBT but you will find these remarks in brackets { } from
'FDR' by Ted Morgan, TOUCHSTONE BOOK published by Simon & Schuster New
York p493 regarding Congressman Martin Dies of Texas MOST SINISTERLY interesting.
In 1938, Dies started a Committee on Un-American Activities in Congress. {He
originated the techniques later brought into full bloom by Senator Joseph
McCarthy --- unfounded charges, lack of substantial evidence, use of guilt
by association, denial of opportunity for the accused to answer the charges
and repeated public assertions of the extreme danger of a largely imaginary
threat.} I wonder why "Family" Courts cross my mind?
10.02: You may find the following gem of some interest. Some time ago I saw
Ms. Barbara Kay, Canadian Association for Equality, info@equalcanadians.com
on Youtube. I do not know when this video was first made. On this video "From
Women's Rights, To Feminist Wrongs ~ By Barbara Kay " she said that there
are 4 MILLION single Fathers raising children, be they widowers or simply
"Normal" Single Fathers in North America. She said that there is
NO evidence WHATSOEVER to link children raised in Single Father homes to the
type of Disasters that the research shows regarding children raised in Single
Mother homes, something that the PEER-REVIEWED Research has been proclaiming
for the last 60 years. In this video Ms. Barbara Kay says that two of Canada's
nine Supreme Court Justices, when they were Court of Appeal judges awarded
SOLE custody to women in 90% of their cases, a figure that defies the Law
of Averages. She also says that in 90% of litigated Custody cases Mom gains
SOLE Custody a figure that again defies the Law of Averages. She also says
that one Alberta judge has said that 80% of Domestic Violence or Sexual Abuse
of children by fathers allegations, during Custody battles are FALSE allegations.
She also says that the Male Suicide rate in Ordinary times, is FOUR times
the female rate. But this rate TRIPLES (3*4) during Custody disputes. Women's
Suicide Rates stay flat during Custody disputes, whereas Men's rates triple.
In Australia an MP heading a Committee dealing with the effects of Divorce
has estimated that there are PER WEEK about 20 Suicides from Court-imposed
hardship. An American academic has estimated that there are some 1,000 Divorced
Male Suicides PER YEAR in the USA for similar reasons.
11.01: We ignore the lessons of History at our peril. There is NO CASE known
to History of any Society that has survived an attack on the Married Hetrosexual
family, REGARDLESS of the bona fides of those involved. Social history shows
that once you deviate from the statement "one man & one woman married
together until one of them dies living together in the family home with their
children" as the definition of "family", a disaster, most especially
for children follows sooner or later.
11.02: In June 1941, as Germany prepared to invade Russia, German officers
on the ground (as opposed to the Nazi leaders) told the troops that the serious
fighting would last 4 weeks, that the Germans would be at the Urals in 14
weeks and that they would all be back home in Germany for Christmas.
11.03: In 1941, as Hitler's armies were racing towards Moscow, Stalin summoned
Ivan Stamenev, the Bulgarian Ambassador to Moscow to the Kremlin, and asked
him to mediate with the Germans, as Bulgaria was neutral. Stamenev refused
saying 'Even if you have to retreat to the Urals, you will beat them in the
end', a prediction that Time proved correct. Men and families are now back
at the Urals.
11.04: If you had said 'This is the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union'
on December 24, 1979, when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, you would
have been the butt of EVERY joke as people rolled around the streets laughing
at you. We all now KNOW that the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan WAS the beginning
of the end of the Soviet Empire.
11.05: Slowly, families are moving westward. We are NOT QUITE YET in the position
of the Soviet trooper Sgt. Alyosha Kovalyov who on May 02, 1945, hoisted the
Soviet flag over the Reichstag in the famous photograph. The day WILL come
when Families hoist the Flag of Freedom over the TOXIC MT EVERST called 'Family'
Law' in Western countries.
11.06: The Anti-Family/Child Abuse PONZI Scheme Agenda will eventually cause
TOTAL Social Collapse as some people have predicted. This will mean the END
of the Cradle-to-Grave Western Social Welfare system. In the LONG-TERM Total
Social Breakdown, which will make the Economic Mess TODAY look like a toddlers'
playschool tiff, will benefit Society, especially children. This will mean
that a GOOD man of 40 - 50 years of age can marry a lady half his age and
father 9 children. The young lady of 24 will have NO PROBLEM marrying a man
of 40 years of age and having 8 children as HE will have a house & an
income to make a family lifestyle practical. On the other hand a woman older
than 35 will have great difficulties becoming a mother. We will see a return
of LARGE families of 6 - 10 children as people will NEED the children to support
the parents in old age as CHILDREN become new Pensions. To a certain extent
this return of LARGE families has started in Europe. In Portugal a new Pensions'
Law has linked a person's pension to the number of children that a person
had. So the BIGGER the family, the BIGGER the pension you get. I have NO ILLUSIONS
that I might see this day. I reckon that Victory is about 40 years away. I
do NOT expect my son to taste Victory. But WHEN Victory comes and come it
will, all the TOXIC PARASITES the "Family Court" judges, Legal Aid
lawyers, psychotherapists, mediators, counsellors, social workers, etc WILL
have to get a job as opposed to profiting from child abuse. We will also see,
possibly QUITE soon, people grow their own food as people will be hungry as
opposed to any sentimental reasons.
12.01: We had a "Children's Rights" Referendum in Ireland on November
10, 2012, which got 58% support. This referendum will reduce parents especially
MARRIED Parents to the level of magnified babysitters for the State.
12.02: In 1900 the American Association of Atheists said that by 1950 Christianity
would be dead in the USA. This prediction was based on the fact that 42% of
College-educated Americans said in the previous Census that they did NOT believe
in God. The USA is now the MOST religious Western country. Ah, yes, Time is
a GREAT & GLORIOUS Storyteller.
| |
Webmaster |
|
Latest Update |
5 July 2015 |
|
|
