Goebbels is alive and well -- his legacy has
been inherited by the Female Supremacist media and education system.
On March 21st 2006, the TV WOM 6 O'clock News included an item where presenter
Wendy Petrie introduced an item on male cosmetic surgery by saying something
like: "New Zealand men apparently have been hit by a severe attack of
vanity." Then she said that male use of botox was now 33% of total use.
This negative slant on male behaviour is uncalled-for.
Logically, that would mean that women are twice as vain as men, but you
would never get an item introduced on TV WOM like: "New Zealand women
apparently have been hit by an attack of vanity twice as severe as that suffered
by men."
That is because there is a partly-deliberate campaign
by Feminists to denigrate men. It is only partly deliberate, because the Western
media and education systems have indoctrinated us so effectively in Lesbian
man-hating that despising men is now a normal aspect of Western culture.
The other side of the coin is that Feminist journalists use the media to
artificially bolster women's self-esteem. For example, Michelle Quirke, in
the Dominion Post of 15 March 2006, wrote an article entitled: "Will
you take this lesser mortal?", which was about a study that apparently
found that there are a lot of educated women nowadays who are "forced"
to marry less educated men.
It is only when you get to the bottom of the article
that you find out that the study also indicates that the
excess of women over men in a certain age-group in New Zealand might
well be caused by men voting with their penises and bringing
foreign brides home, so as to avoid marrying a Kiwi man-hater.
Other examples of ludicrous women-boosting that I
have come across are a white-haired Feminist teacher refusing to believe that
any female teacher could do anything bad, and a gushing statement by man-hater
Linda Clarke (formerly on Radio New Zealand) about how heroic (all) women
were (in relation to their health problems).
Feminist journalists do not take right-wing politicians
at face value, so why should we take Feminist journalists and teachers at
face value ? They are, by and large, sexist man-haters, and their numbers
and influence have to be controlled.