Home > Issues > The Culture of a Law School > Open Letter to Greg King
	Empowering Men: fighting feminist lies
Open Letter to Greg King* © Peter Zohrab 2010

 

Re: Court Report

1) Congratulations on one of the best programmes on any TV channel (in my opinion)!

2) Episode 6 had a female lawyer (I didn't catch her name) saying that there is one certainty in criminal cases: that the victim is a victim. That is not true, and you did not pick her up on it. In false rape complaints, often no rape actually took place, meaning that there was no victim -- see the webpage http://nzmera.orconhosting.net.nz/womliar.html which is about a Lower Hutt woman caught out by surveillance camera when she claimed to have been raped. The Police aren't perfect, so some such cases must surely end up in court.

3) In Episode 1 you discussed an adoption case which involved the court apparently ignoring the clearly stated will of Parliament. I don't know the name of the case and haven't read it, but it seems to me that you did not spell out the constitutional implications properly.

Of course, you have a conflict of interest, since you have to appear before judges to earn your living.

In fact, it is not up to the court to deliberately create a mess so that Parliament will have to clean it up, when there is only one way that Parliament could possibly clean it up -- i.e. to liberalise the adoption law.

It appears that the judges, you, and your guest think that homosexual couples (and other non-married couples) should be allowed to adopt children, but Parliament is entitled to decide (by refusing to act) that that would be a bridge too far, and it is not democratic for some legal people, brainwashed by the propaganda that they are exposed to, to decide otherwise on behalf of the electorate.

4) I object to the presence of Steve Price on the show, because he is unprofessional and creates the impression of so-called "liberal" bias on the show. He taught me Legal System, and, during one test, he ran up the aisle (which I was sitting next to), turned his head as he passed me, and appeared to take a close and deliberate look at my test paper. Since tests are meant to be taken anonymously, and students are only identified by their ID numbers, I was obviously bound to wonder if he was trying to recognise my handwriting, so as to learn (later) what my ID number was. At the very least, his behaviour was a case of bullying, because it created the fear in me of being victimised for my political beliefs.

He and I had already crossed swords on the Internet, in relation to an Upper Hutt case of domestic murder.

 

*Greg King later apparently took his own life, after having come under intense, negative public pressure as a result of his having successfully defended an accused murderer who the public generally thought was in fact guilty.

 

Home Issues Links FAQ Book Quotes Lawyers Email us ! SiteMap

Webmaster Peter Douglas Zohrab Latest Update 27 July 2015

Top