Home > Issues > Abortion Rights of the Fetus > Submission on the Abortion Legislation Bill 2019 |
||||||||||
|
Empowering Men:fighting feminist lies |
|||||||||
Submission on the Abortion Legislation Bill 2019Peter Zohrab 2019 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
It is grossly discriminatory -- and predetermines the outcome, to some extent -- for the Select Committee to be composed almost entirely of women. Men were stupid enough to give women the vote and now women ride roughshod over the lives of men, unborn children and fathers -- sending men off to wars and killing their unborn children. I was once an unborn child. You do not have the right to kill me or any of my fellows.
The most important health issue which abortion involves is the health of the unborn child, since it is murdered with extreme cruelty by the abortion process. Women are extremely cruel creatures who insist on telling lies, creating sexist fictions and fake "experts" on Family Violence, building up each others' self-esteem and denigrating men.
Since Feminists are hypocrites, they see nothing wrong with promoting the rights of animals, while perpetrating genocide on unborn children.
One of the arguments that Feminists put forward in support of abortion is that unborn children are not persons. If that results in abortion being morally permissible, then cruelty towards animals must be even more permissible than abortion, because it can be argued that unborn children are people, although that is a totally impossible argument in the case of animals.
The Animal Rights movement is basically a Feminist reaction to their own guil
t feeling about murdering unborn children.
One of the arguments that Feminists put forward in support of abortion is that the unborn child is inside the woman’s body and that therefore that woman has the right to choose what happens to it. However, there is no general principle in law or morality, whereby you are allowed to kill anything that is inside your body. If someone happened to place part of their body inside my mouth, that would not give me the right to bite it off.
Moreover, the argument that the unborn child is inside the woman’s body and that therefore that woman has the right to choose what happens to it is a sexist argument. Women’s procreative apparatus has the general shape of a container; something that contains things. However, men’s procreative apparatus has the general shape of a penetrater; something that penetrates things. It is therefore sexist and discriminatory of Feminists to give special rights to containers, as compared to penetraters.
I therefore submit that, if this Bill passes, male-on-female rape should be treated as a health issue, since the male has the right to possess whatever female his penis is inside of.
It is obvious that any reform of the law relating to abortion should include the reform or abolition of the Child Support Act 1991. In fact, that should already have happened long ago.
If the only person who has any say in whether an unborn child is born or not is the mother (which is already the case at present), then it is obvious on Human Rights grounds that no men should ever have to pay child support to any woman. However, if a woman -- having decided not to have an abortion -- gives birth to a child who ends up in the sole custody of the purported father, then the mother should of course pay child support to that man. No other forms of heterosexual child support should be allowed to exist in law.
Suppose that a woman becomes pregnant and the legally liable man wants her to have an abortion, but she refuses. The man has no legal right to force her to have an abortion -- yet he becomes liable to pay child support once the child is born. If he assaults her and intentionally causes the death of the unborn child, then he is guilty of Murder (and "Assault on a Female") -- yet she can have an abortion without legal penalty!
I can remember the days when Feminists were up in arms about "Double Standards" -- but now Parliament is constantly creating double standards that discriminate against men.
Recommendations
1. The Bill be rejected in its entirety.
2. The Child Support Act 1991 and the Crimes Act 1961 be amended to give fathers equal rights with mothers as to abortion and liability for Child Support be made dependent on having had an equal say in the relevant decision not to have an abortion.
3. If the previous two recommendations are not accepted, then rape should be made a men's health issue.